Index > > Unemployment Benefit Extension for Oct 2009

Unemployment Benefit Extension for Oct 2009

[Summary]Illinois Unemployment - Know Your Rights | Know your unemployment rights in Illinois! Find out if you are eligible for unemployment benefits, how to apply or what happens in case you are fired etc. NEET A NEET or neet is a young


Illinois Unemployment - Know Your Rights |

Unemployment Benefit Extension for Oct 2009

Know your unemployment rights in Illinois! Find out if you are eligible for unemployment benefits, how to apply or what happens in case you are fired etc.


A NEET or neet is a young person who is "Not in Education, Employment, or Training". The acronym NEET was first used in the United Kingdom but its use has spread to other countries and regions including Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the United States.

In the United Kingdom, the classification comprises people aged between 16 and 24 (some 16 and 17 year-olds are still of compulsory school age); the subgroup of NEETs aged 16–18 is frequently of particular focus. In Japan, the classification comprises people aged between 15 and 34 who are not employed, not engaged in housework, not enrolled in school or work-related training, and not seeking work.

Department of Commerce, Government of India

Fisheries included in the sectors which are exempted from maintenance of average EO under EPCG Scheme.

Additional flexibility under Target Plus Scheme (TPS) / Duty Free Certificate of Entitlement (DFCE) Scheme for Status Holders given to Marine sector.

To neutralize duty incidence on Jewellery exports and hence to allow Duty Drawback on such exports, duty drawback rates notified by Department of Revenue.

Updated: 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds

Warren is a very smart man, who clearly understands money better than the politicians and most economists. Last year, he helped edit a paper I wrote, that unfortunately wasn’t published. So I’ll share it with you, here:

Is It Time For a FICA Holiday?

Traditional thinking has produced an economic disaster, which the same traditional thinking cannot solve. As the U.S. and world economies slip into recession, we must remember this ultimately is a bookkeeping crisis. The housing “market” was destroyed, but not the actual houses. They still exist. Nothing real has been destroyed. Instead, we are starved for money.
This problem should be easier to remedy than a food shortage, water shortage or wartime destruction, because a money shortage can be cured by the simple expedient of adding money – something the federal government is uniquely empowered to do.
We propose a FICA payroll tax “holiday,” whereby the U.S. Treasury will make our Social Security and Medicare payments for us. This will add about $10 billion per week to our take-home pay, and another $10 billion to business income, both of which urgently are needed. When we eliminate this partly double, severely regressive tax, we will give consumers the income they need to make mortgage payments, to pay bills, and to do the shopping American business craves. The FICA holiday also will provide business with money for jobs and investment.
In contrast, the “top down” approach (saving Fannie Mae, buying toxic mortgages), while necessary, does not directly address consumer/business money needs, and has had only modest effect.
Common knowledge holds that Social Security and Medicare will face bankruptcy even with FICA. So proposed fixes invariably include benefit cuts, reducing consumer incomes, or tax increases, cutting consumer and business spending power – the opposite of what our economy requires.
Many people fear federal deficit spending when it supports Social Security and Medicare, but not when it supports the military. Social Security spending for 2008 is approximately $600 billion, about equal to the defense budget. Ironically, both candidates for President believed Social Security will run out of money and the military will not. The $1 trillion in “stimulus” spending was authorized without increased taxes. Both candidates advocated tax cuts.
Even during the darkest days of the Great Depression, the federal government never ran out of money. Massive government spending, before and during World War II, helped lift us from the Depression.
In 1971 President Nixon eliminated any risk of government insolvency by ending the last vestiges of the gold standard. At the stroke of a pen, he assured that neither the government, nor any of its agencies, could run short of money. Social Security and Medicare, being two of those 400+ agencies, are immune from bankruptcy.
If Congress authorizes the Treasury to make our Social Security and Medicare payments for us, thus allowing our take-home pay to rise, the economy will begin to recover. The elimination of FICA deductions would provide consumers and business with more than a trillion additional dollars annually, exactly what a healthy economy needs.
Won’t this increase the federal deficit? Yes, but President Nixon’s signature guaranteed the government never will run short of money to service its debts. This act removed taxes as a necessary source of federal money. Together with federal spending, taxation became a mere tool to create optimal output and employment. Whatever deficit accomplishes that goal is the right size.
Doesn’t a large deficit cause higher interest rates? No, interest rates are set by the Federal Reserve. The government can set rates at any level it wishes.
Doesn’t a large federal debt create a shortage of lending funds? No, the more money the government pumps into the economy, the more lending funds are created.
Won’t our children have to pay for the increased deficit? No, the government owes the debt and easily services a debt of any size. Our children are not the debtors. (In many cases, they even are the creditors.) Because the “right” size debt will continue to grow forever as our economy grows, it never should be reduced or paid back.
Meanwhile, each year the increased debt will help keep output high and unemployment low, benefiting our children with additional income, goods and services.
Won’t increasing the deficit by eliminating FICA, cause inflation? President Carter had modest deficits and high inflation. President Reagan had the highest deficits in American history and modest inflation. Contrary to popular wisdom, federal debt has not caused inflations, recessions, high interest rates or any other negative economic effects. On the contrary, large deficits have been associated with economic growth.
In summary, we offer new thinking – an accounting fix to an accounting problem: Eliminate FICA and pay for Medicare and Social Security the same way we pay for Congress, the military, the Supreme Court and every other federal agency, by functionally folding these two agencies into the general fund. The economic crisis has presented us with the rare opportunity to accomplish two important goals: Permanently fix the seemingly intractable Social Security and Medicare problems, and energize our economy.

[Editor: Admin]
Related for Unemployment Benefit Extension for Oct 2009
  • Unemployment Benefit ExtensionJanuary 23

    Unemployment Insurance Extended Benefits, Employment & Training Administration (ETA) Unemployment Insurance Extended Benefits Extended Benefits are available to workers who have exhausted regular unemployment insurance benefits during periods of high

  • Michigan Unemployment Benefit ExtensionJanuary 23

    UIA Michigan Web Account Manager for Claimants and Employers The Michigan Web Account Manager (MiWAM) is the Unemployment Insurance Agency's (UIA) system for managing your unemployment account electronically. MiWAM has been updated to serve you bette

  • Second Unemployment Benefit ExtensionJune 19

    Extended Unemployment Benefits in Texas - TWC Equal Opportunity Employer/Program Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. Deaf, hard-of-hearing or speech-impaired customers may contact Relay Texas: 800-

  • Unemployment Benefit Extension July 2010June 19

    Unemployment extension Unemployment extension occurs when regular unemployment benefits are exhausted and extended for additional weeks. Unemployment extensions are created by passing new legislation at the federal level, often referred to as an "une

  • Unemployment Benefit Extension June 2010June 19

    FAQ: Unemployment Extension The Senate abandoned efforts to extend unemployment benefits after Democrats failed to overcome a Republican-led filibuster on a bill that also included aid to states and tax changes. Below are some questions about how thi

  • Unemployment Benefit Extension BushFebruary 11

    Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 Introduced in the House as H.R. 4853 by Rep. James Oberstar on March 16, 2010 (in unrelated form); subsequently introduced December 1, 2010 (in this form)[1] Passed the

  • How Do I File an Extension for Unemployment?January 1

    How to Extend Unemployment Compensation: 7 Steps (with Pictures) How to Extend Unemployment Compensation Two Parts:Gathering InformationApplying for Extended CompensationCommunity Q&A In the United States, federally mandated unemployment compensation

  • Unemployment Compensation ExtensionJune 19

    Unemployment Insurance Extended Benefits, Employment & Training Administration (ETA) Unemployment Insurance Extended Benefits Extended Benefits are available to workers who have exhausted regular unemployment insurance benefits during periods of high

  • Unemployment Benefit Payment HistoryOctober 17

    Unemployment Insurance Unemployment Insurance Do you currently participate in a Shared Work program? Please take a moment to answer a few quick questions (on SurveyMonkey) about your experience. Please do not do the survey unless you are currently pa

Copyright Asdnyi All rights reserved.